CVE-2017-6316 — Citrix Multiple Products Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVE-2017-6316 (Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN Enterprise, CloudBridge Virtual WAN, and XenMobile Server) is in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog since 2022-03-25. A vulnerability has been identified in the management interface of Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN Enterprise and… See the required…

Exploitation status

CVE-2017-6316 is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, added 2022-03-25. A vulnerability has been identified in the management interface of Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN Enterprise and Standard Edition and Citrix CloudBridge Virtual WAN Edition that could result in an unauthenticated, remote attacker being able to execute arbitrary code as a root user. This vulnerability also affects XenMobile Server.

Advisory facts

Vendor or project
Citrix
Affected product
NetScaler SD-WAN Enterprise, CloudBridge Virtual WAN, and XenMobile Server
Added to CISA KEV
2022-03-25
US federal remediation due date
2022-04-15
Ransomware association
Unknown
EPSS score
—
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-20

Remediation: the required action

Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Wording published by CISA for this catalog entry. It is the baseline action, not a decision about your environment: whether this exposure matters for you depends on where the affected component runs, what it is exposed to and who owns it.

From advisory to a decision you can defend

A catalog entry tells you a vulnerability is being exploited somewhere. It does not tell you whether it matters in your estate, who owns the fix, or what evidence an auditor will ask for later. That is the work VulnTrek does: it takes findings from the tools you already run, decides which exposure actually matters, routes it to an owner, keeps remediation human-approved and retains the lineage as evidence.

Sourced from public upstream advisories (CISA KEV, ENISA EUVD, vendor PSIRTs) mirrored daily. Informational only — not a remediation decision, not legal advice, and the absence of a record is not evidence of safety.