CVE-2023-34362 — Progress MOVEit Transfer SQL Injection Vulnerability

CVE-2023-34362 (Progress MOVEit Transfer) is in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog since 2023-06-02. Used in ransomware. Progress MOVEit Transfer contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated attacker… See the required fix, due date and advisories.

Exploitation status

CVE-2023-34362 is listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, added 2023-06-02. Progress MOVEit Transfer contains a SQL injection vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to MOVEit Transfer's database. Depending on the database engine being used (MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, or Azure SQL), an attacker may be able to infer information about the structure and contents of the database in addition to executing SQL statements that alter or delete database elements.

Advisory facts

Vendor or project
Progress
Affected product
MOVEit Transfer
Added to CISA KEV
2023-06-02
US federal remediation due date
2023-06-23
Ransomware association
Known
EPSS score
—
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-89

Remediation: the required action

Apply updates per vendor instructions.

Wording published by CISA for this catalog entry. It is the baseline action, not a decision about your environment: whether this exposure matters for you depends on where the affected component runs, what it is exposed to and who owns it.

From advisory to a decision you can defend

A catalog entry tells you a vulnerability is being exploited somewhere. It does not tell you whether it matters in your estate, who owns the fix, or what evidence an auditor will ask for later. That is the work VulnTrek does: it takes findings from the tools you already run, decides which exposure actually matters, routes it to an owner, keeps remediation human-approved and retains the lineage as evidence.

Sourced from public upstream advisories (CISA KEV, ENISA EUVD, vendor PSIRTs) mirrored daily. Informational only — not a remediation decision, not legal advice, and the absence of a record is not evidence of safety.